Январь 2010 Февраль 2010 Март 2010 Апрель 2010 Май 2010
Июнь 2010
Июль 2010 Август 2010
Сентябрь 2010
Октябрь 2010
Ноябрь 2010
Декабрь 2010
Январь 2011
Февраль 2011 Март 2011 Апрель 2011 Май 2011 Июнь 2011 Июль 2011 Август 2011
Сентябрь 2011
Октябрь 2011 Ноябрь 2011 Декабрь 2011 Январь 2012 Февраль 2012 Март 2012 Апрель 2012 Май 2012 Июнь 2012 Июль 2012 Август 2012 Сентябрь 2012 Октябрь 2012 Ноябрь 2012 Декабрь 2012 Январь 2013 Февраль 2013 Март 2013 Апрель 2013 Май 2013 Июнь 2013 Июль 2013 Август 2013 Сентябрь 2013 Октябрь 2013 Ноябрь 2013 Декабрь 2013 Январь 2014 Февраль 2014
Март 2014
Апрель 2014 Май 2014 Июнь 2014 Июль 2014 Август 2014 Сентябрь 2014 Октябрь 2014 Ноябрь 2014 Декабрь 2014 Январь 2015 Февраль 2015 Март 2015 Апрель 2015 Май 2015 Июнь 2015 Июль 2015 Август 2015 Сентябрь 2015 Октябрь 2015 Ноябрь 2015 Декабрь 2015 Январь 2016 Февраль 2016 Март 2016 Апрель 2016 Май 2016 Июнь 2016 Июль 2016 Август 2016 Сентябрь 2016 Октябрь 2016 Ноябрь 2016 Декабрь 2016 Январь 2017 Февраль 2017 Март 2017 Апрель 2017 Май 2017
Июнь 2017
Июль 2017
Август 2017 Сентябрь 2017 Октябрь 2017 Ноябрь 2017 Декабрь 2017 Январь 2018 Февраль 2018 Март 2018 Апрель 2018 Май 2018 Июнь 2018 Июль 2018 Август 2018 Сентябрь 2018 Октябрь 2018 Ноябрь 2018 Декабрь 2018 Январь 2019
Февраль 2019
Март 2019 Апрель 2019 Май 2019 Июнь 2019 Июль 2019 Август 2019 Сентябрь 2019 Октябрь 2019 Ноябрь 2019 Декабрь 2019 Январь 2020
Февраль 2020
Март 2020 Апрель 2020 Май 2020 Июнь 2020 Июль 2020 Август 2020 Сентябрь 2020 Октябрь 2020 Ноябрь 2020 Декабрь 2020 Январь 2021 Февраль 2021 Март 2021 Апрель 2021 Май 2021 Июнь 2021 Июль 2021 Август 2021 Сентябрь 2021 Октябрь 2021 Ноябрь 2021 Декабрь 2021 Январь 2022 Февраль 2022 Март 2022 Апрель 2022 Май 2022 Июнь 2022 Июль 2022 Август 2022 Сентябрь 2022 Октябрь 2022 Ноябрь 2022 Декабрь 2022 Январь 2023 Февраль 2023 Март 2023 Апрель 2023 Май 2023 Июнь 2023 Июль 2023 Август 2023 Сентябрь 2023 Октябрь 2023 Ноябрь 2023 Декабрь 2023 Январь 2024 Февраль 2024 Март 2024 Апрель 2024 Май 2024 Июнь 2024 Июль 2024 Август 2024 Сентябрь 2024 Октябрь 2024 Ноябрь 2024 Декабрь 2024
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Game News |

With a mix of RTS and deckbuilding, Warcana is truly one of the strangest genre patchworks I've ever seen

I'd like to introduce you to Warcana, one of the strangest and most surprising combinations of game genres I've ever seen. It calls itself a "real-time base defense strategy game with a unique deckbuilding mechanic." That's mostly right, but it's only a fraction of the story for so many reasons. The simple combination of two concepts becomes an entangling weed of game design that wraps around and warps every part of what might otherwise be familiar in Warcana. 

Because your armies and towers auto-attack, your attention is instead spent on planning your economy, laying out your defenses, and crafting your base. All of that is dictated by the top layer of your strategy: Managing the deck of cards that let you build and summon units. By doing that Warcana pulls off a trick I'm not sure I've ever seen before: It let me play a deckbuilder to control a base-building RTS. It's weird. I've played a lot of both genres, and I'm still not sure quite what to make of this hybrid mutation.

The basic format of Warcana is head-to-head tower defense where you're responsible both for defending your own stuff and spawning the units that'll take down your enemy. You do this over a series of progressively longer rounds, each with a short safe period at the start where nothing can spawn, then a much longer period where your two islands come together for combat. It happens over and over until only one combatant is left.

At least for the default battle royale and head-to-head modes—there are also wave survival and horde modes and more esoteric win conditions spread across the 30-some singleplayer missions and the various other multiplayer and custom game modes that Warcana launches with.

All of it looks really damn cool. There are thousands of units on screen swarming at enemy constructions, firing projectiles, and knocking breaches in walls. Towers fire lasers and stones and whip with vines or swing huge clubs all of which carve away enemies in huge swathes 10 at a time. The spells collapse huge buildings or send in yet another wave of thousands against your enemies.

(Image credit: Team17)

It all seems like simple and straightforward enough base defense stuff, but then you introduce the deckbuilding part. Your options of what to build are determined by the cards you've drawn: Each card you play will have one of a few different effects to choose, ranging from resource income to adding new cards to your deck. Literally everything except for walls has to get built from a card. Once played and discarded you can draw a new card, up to your hand limit, and keep playing until you've either run out of the dual energy/substance resources, played every card in your deck, or decided to take a strategic pause.

From a starting point of 10 or fewer cards you've got to build a "deck" of available actions that'll let you win. You'll need economy cards and buildings to balance your two resources, cards and buildings that provide secondary benefits like a larger hand size or a few automatically spawning troops, cards that summon hordes of troops at once, and spells that can do all the above and more, providing defensive benefits to you or knocking holes in the enemy's fortress. It's most like a normal deckbuilding game in that you have to do it all without cluttering your deck to the point where you can fail to draw your most useful cards in a round, and in that you can mix-and-match the five factions and their starter cards to make a setup all your own.

At the same time it's barely deckbuilding at all, because in real time your laser focus is on streamlining and eliminating the fat of your deck to keep you safe and supplied and knock out your opponent. Your deck will always start a match with the same few cards you chose, and you have almost complete control of what gets added to it and when. There's no carrying your deck between matches, either: It's purpose-built over the course of one battle and then discarded.

To perform at peak skill in multiplayer—and even with the luxury pause in singleplayer—you have to know the plan for your deck from the start. This is deckbuilding as a classic RTS build order. You have a plan and a little flexibility in how you execute, but you know your faction and how to play it and which units to deploy in order to win against what enemies.

Which is to say… when are cards not really cards, nor a proper deck? When they're a tech tree in disguise.

The build order and tech tree are fundamentals for the RTS, and Warcana pretty cleverly presents them to you in the form factor of a small deckbuilding process. It's not a hidden thing, either: the details of a card can be very clearly opened in a branching diagram that shows you every card it can add to your deck or become over time.

Thus the deckbuilding here isn't the main mechanism or even the primary mechanic of Warcana, it's actually an elaborate conceit that randomizes how you're allowed to build up your base and attack your opponents. It decides which units you can play, in which order, and knowing how to manipulate that in order to thrive is half of your skillset.

(Image credit: Team17)

It's hard to pass judgment on the idea because it's so novel—and if you're interested I do suggest you check it out—but I suspect that Warcana probably has the same problems as Valve's doomed Artifact, that brilliantly designed and intricate clockwork mechanism of a card game that nobody was really smart enough to play very well. (I also suspect that it's going to be a terror on the developers' game balance skills as players find and exploit broken combos.)

After a few dozen hours with Warcana I feel like I've barely started figuring out what the strategies are and how to employ them. Should you focus on economy and defense or build a tempo that keeps opponents on the back foot? Should you build pure decks of one faction or hybridize for maximum flexibility at the expense of less reliability?

I hope that the appeal of the base building RTS fun, and the sheer wow factor of how cool it looks in motion, will draw in players that sustain it for a while. I'm very curious where it's going to go, and if you're interested in the strange frontiers of game design I encourage you to spend some time with it as well.



Читайте также

Слабаки: этих боссов модно убить одним ударом

Today's Wordle answer for Monday, December 9

Witcher 3 modders datamine a quest where Geralt would have teleported to Night City from Cyberpunk 2077: 'Technologically advanced, but broken. Dying.'




Game24.pro — паблик игровых новостей в календарном формате на основе технологичной новостной информационно-поисковой системы с элементами искусственного интеллекта, гео-отбора и возможностью мгновенной публикации авторского контента в режиме Free Public. Game24.pro — ваши Game News сегодня и сейчас в Вашем городе.

Опубликовать свою новость, реплику, комментарий, анонс и т.д. можно мгновенно — здесь.


Персональные новости

ТСД SAOTRON RT41 GUN: практичный, производительный, надёжный

В Казани наградили победителей регионального отборочного тура благотворительного фестиваля «Добрая волна»

Сотрудники московских предприятий побывали на производстве Гжельского фарфорового завода

«Райтек ДТГ» перевел китайский завод на российскую ERP